The Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT has started accepting applications from organizations seeking to be named as testing and certification bodies for electronic health record systems, Modern Healthcare reports.

Under the 2009 federal economic stimulus package, health care providers who demonstrate “meaningful use” of certified EHR systems will qualify for federal incentive payments.

ONC issued the final rule on the temporary testing and certification program on June 18, and the rule appeared in the Federal Register on June 24.

The stimulus package gave ONC the option of retaining the Certification Commission for Health IT as the sole EHR certification group or recognizing a new organization, according to Modern Healthcare. ONC opted to expand its search for a new group, and CCHIT has joined a pool of applicants for the distinction.

Carol Bean, a standards harmonization analyst for ONC, said HHS to date has received about 40 application inquiries and 14 requests for applications. She said ONC has 30 days after receiving an application to decide whether the organization qualifies as an “authorized testing and certification body” under the temporary certification program.

The final rules for the permanent authorization program have not yet been released, although a proposed rule was issued in March (Conn, Modern Healthcare, 7/1).

Source:http://www.ihealthbeat.org/articles/2010/7/2/onc-starts-accepting-applications-for-ehr-certification-groups.aspx

The Electronic Healthcare Network Accreditation Commission has recommended a series of changes to the federal government’s proposed rule on electronic health record certification, Healthcare IT News reports.

EHNAC, a not-for-profit standards group, issued the recommendations in response to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on EHR certification.

ONC’s proposed rule calls for the establishment of a temporary EHR certification program, which eventually would be replaced by a permanent certification program. The temporary program would allow ONC-authorized certification bodies to test and certify EHRs and EHR modules.

Recommendations

EHNAC officials said the group is concerned that the current definition of ONC-authorized certification bodies would exclude EHNAC and other organizations from consideration as certifiers of health information exchanges.

The group said its recommendations would enable EHNAC to be named a health data exchange certifier without needing official designation as an EHR certifier.

In its recommendations, EHNAC called for ONC to:

• Allow certifiers to establish a “virtual” office for conducting certification tasks;
• Extend the deadline for organizations to develop certification programs to encourage more groups to apply for designation as temporary certifiers;
• Eliminate unscheduled site visits and provide organizations with sufficient time to prepare for planned visits; and
• Refrain from considering a certified testing program a necessary requirement for the certification of health IT products (Monegain, Healthcare IT News, 5/25).

Above article publish on http://www.ihealthbeat.org/articles/2010/5/25/standards-organization-calls-for-onc-to-revisit-ehr-certification-rule.aspx

By, Rich Silverman

Massachusetts, long a leader in the delivery of quality medical care to its citizens, has just received more than $24 million from the federal government to speed the adoption of electronic medical records (EMRs) throughout the Commonwealth.

According to a report in govmonitor .com, the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) has authorized the release of the $24 million, the maximum that Massachusetts is entitled to under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009. According to the report, $13.4 million will go to support the adoption of EMRs throughout the Commonwealth, and another $1.6 million will go toward creating a statewide high-speed communications system for medical data and records.

According to Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick, “This federal funding will help reduce health care costs and improve patient care using proven technologies, many of which are developed right here in Massachusetts.” Lieutenant Governor Timothy Murray added that in addition to streamlining health care, the money would help create jobs.

The grants, given in furtherance of the adoption of EMRs, will be administered by the Massachusetts e-Health Institute, the state agency created for that purpose. One if its key goals, according to an article in MassHighTech.com, will be to ensure the privacy of all medical records in the state.

Couple the release of this funding with recent news that meaningful use has finally been defined and that ONC is taking definitive steps to develop a certification, and it looks like providers in Massachusetts are finally getting the tools they need to fully implement EMRs.

Above article publish on http://blog.pchealthstop.com/?p=849

By Mary Mosquera

The clock starts ticking today on a two-month window in which the public can comment on the Health & Human Service Department’s “meaningful use” proposal, a set of rules outlining how providers can qualify for incentives for using electronic health records.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT officially published their rules in the Federal Register Jan. 13.

The package comes in two parts: an ONC interim final rule (IFR) covering standards and certification of EHRs and a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services defining the “meaningful use” of health IT.

According to CMS’s meaningful use NPRM, the public has 60 days, or until March 15, in which to comment on the regulation after it is published in the Federal Register. Subsequent revisions will be made, with the final rule expected in spring of 2010.

The ONC interim final rule will become effective 30 days after it is published in the Federal Register, or Feb. 12. However, the public may comment on its possible refinement over the next 60 days, after which ONC will issue the final rule.

The rules describe how physicians and hospitals can qualify for tens of thousands of dollars in financial incentives for meeting three stages of progressively more demanding sets of measures when using health IT in their practices.

The initial set of criteria would concentrate on collecting data electronically, sharing information with other providers and patients, and reporting quality measures to the government.

The standards rule focuses only on standards that comprise a certified EHR. The actual process by which those systems will be certified will be the subject of an additional notice of proposed rulemaking ONC will announce later in 2010.

Since the announcement of the rules Dec. 30, health IT experts have offered a range of opinions about them. Writing in his blog this week, Dr. John Halamka, co-chairman of the Health IT Standards Panel, which advises ONC, said he had received hundreds of emails about the rules. Many find CMS’s proposed rule “intimidating,” he wrote Jan. 11

“Taking a typical community hospital from their current state to the degree of functionality required in the NPRM [proposed rule] is a challenge,” said Halamka, who is also chief information officer of Boston’s Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.

In summarizing the comments he received, Halamka said providers need specific guidance to meet the aggressive interoperability timelines in the rules. “This leaves a choice – either the standards need more detail, especially in the transmission area, or the NPRM goals need to be reduced in scope/extended in time,” Halamka said in his blog.

Above article publish on http://www.govhealthit.com/newsitem.aspx?tid=10&nid=72929

Diana Manos, Senior Editor

The HIT Policy Committee is holding a hearing today in Washington, D.C. to discuss the privacy aspects of healthcare IT found in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA).

Jodi Daniel, director of the Office of Policy and Research at the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC), who opened the meeting this morning, said privacy and security are fundamental building blocks for meaningful use of healthcare IT.

“The success of health information technology and exchange rests on consumer and provider confidence in privacy and security protections,” she said.

Daniel outlined the key privacy aspects found in ARRA. The HIT Policy Committee is responsible for advising the federal government on:

• Technologies that protect the privacy of health information and promote security in an electronic health record;
• Segmentation and protection from disclosure of specific and sensitive individually identifiable health information with the goal of minimizing the reluctance of patients to seek care;
• Use and disclosure of limited data sets;
• Infrastructure that allows for accurate exchange;
• Technologies for an accounting of TPO (treatment, payment and health operations) disclosures;
• Technologies that allow IIHI to be rendered unusable, unreadable or indecipherable to unauthorized individuals; and
• Methods to facilitate secure access to personal health information by an individual or person assisting in care.

ONC officials proposed a breach notification rule in April, with a final rule out in August. The rule will be effective Sept. 23 with a comment period closing Oct. 23, Daniel said.

Deborah Peel, a national expert on patient healthcare IT privacy, was the first to testify today on patient privacy. “Millions of Americans are concerned about the control of their personal data,” she said. She said ensuring data privacy and security is the only way that healthcare IT can move forward successfully.

Peel said privacy should have been established before policy on healthcare IT.

Above article published on

http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/hit-policy-committee-holds-privacy-hearing-today