Yesterday, Reps. Patrick Kennedy (D-R.I.) and Tim Murphy (R-Pa.) introduced a bill (HR 5025) that would allow behavioral, mental health and substance abuse treatment providers to qualify for incentive payments for the “meaningful use” of electronic health records, Healthcare IT News reports.

Under the 2009 federal economic stimulus package, hospitals and physicians who demonstrate meaningful use of EHRs can qualify for incentive payments through Medicaid and Medicare.

The new Health Information Technology Extension for Behavioral Health Services Act of 2010 would extend eligibility for the incentive payments to:

• Behavioral and mental health professionals and clinics;
• Substance abuse professionals and treatment facilities;
• Psychiatric hospitals; and
• Licensed psychologists and clinical social workers (Merrill, Healthcare IT News, 4/16).

Above article publish on http://www.ihealthbeat.org/articles/2010/4/16/bill-would-expand-eligibility-for-meaningful-use-incentives.aspx

By Andrea Kraynak

Hospitals with electronic health records (EHR) may be eligible for meaningful use incentives as early as October 2010, and physicians follow soon after. What if a provider is hoping to take advantage of the incentives, but is still fully paper-based? Waiting for the release of final rules on the incentive program and EHR certification before moving forward may not be wise.

Providers should begin by looking into the reasons their facility doesn’t have many of the components that make up an EHR, or lacks an electronic system altogether. For example, if providers haven’t begun to invest in a system because of high up-front costs, they may be able to obtain funding that can help.

“Right now, there is a significant amount of money that is being funneled through the states for health IT,” says Chris Apgar, CISSP, president of Apgar & Associates, LLC, in Portland, OR. Depending on their location, healthcare providers may be able to take advantage of it.

“Go to the medical association in your state that you’re a member of, and put a little pressure on them,” he says.

If your state has grant or loan funding available, remind your association that there is money available and encourage them to lobby and partner with others to push your state to start allocating EHR funding, whether it happens to be low- or no-interest loans or outright grants.

If your state is not offering funding, there may be other programs you can find that offer no- and low-cost loans and other programs to provide support and consultative assistance, especially for small hospitals and physicians, says Margret Amatayakul, RHIA, CHPS, CPHIT, CPEHR, FHIMSS, president of Margret\A Consulting in Schaumburg, IL.

Smaller providers may also want to look into independent physicians associations (IPA), some of which are purchasing EHRs and making them available through a subscription fee. With this option, you have your own Web-based version, and you pay the IPA a certain amount annually to host the EHR, explains Apgar.

“This can be affordable because you don’t have to go out and buy a brand-new system and implement it and have someone administer it and all that,” he says. “You’re paying a subscription fee to use it, in essence, so you don’t have the cost of ownership.”

Remember, however, that subscription-based EHRs may end up costing more in the end, even though they are becoming more common, Apgar says.

If you are still searching for an EHR vendor, don’t forget about the big picture. With additional requirements coming soon, whether additional meaningful use measures or other capabilities your EHR will need to be ICD-10 compliant, look for a product and vendor that will be able to keep up.

“If you are in the position of buying a product today, you want to be buying a product that is going to take you through those stages,” Amatayakul says. “My sense is that you approach this by trying to address the long haul. Otherwise, you’re going to be faced with pieces of things that don’t work together real well.”

And avoid vendors who don’t have a sense of the upcoming changes and how they plan to address them.

“If there is little to no understanding on the part of the vendor as to what this means, or the vendor can’t describe for you what they plan to do, I would avoid that vendor,” Amatayakul says. “That means they’re not going to be able to keep up.”

Above Article Publish on http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/page-1/TEC-247509/Get-Moving-to-Catch-Early-EHR-Meaningful-Use-Incentives

The Health IT Standards Committee’s implementation work group is considering the development of an online collection of resources to help health care providers and vendors meet proposed “meaningful use” criteria for electronic health records, Government Health IT reports.

Earlier this year, CMS published a notice of proposed rulemaking describing how health care providers can demonstrate meaningful use of certified EHRs to qualify for incentive payments under the 2009 federal economic stimulus package.

At a recent work group meeting, health care providers asked for more guidance on how to comply with the meaningful use rules.

Aneesh Chopra — chair of the panel and U.S. Chief Technology Officer — said the work group could generate a digital library that would enable health care providers to access details about requirements for each meaningful use provision.

He said the panel’s blog could serve as an initial source of information. He added that the work group also could pass along user feedback to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT.

The work group is scheduled to offer recommendations to the full Standards Committee on April 28. The panel might propose a formal resource Web site as part of its recommendations (Mosquera, Government Health IT, 3/31).

Above article publish http://www.ihealthbeat.org/articles/2010/4/1/panel-mulls-creation-of-resource-web-site-for-meaningful-use-rules.aspx

CMS must pay special attention to ensure that the final version of the proposed “meaningful use” rule for electronic health records fits with other rules for standards and certification, as well at the interim final rule for the certification of EHRs, Government Health IT reports.

Earlier this year, CMS published a notice of proposed rulemaking describing how health care providers can demonstrate meaningful use of certified EHRs to qualify for incentive payments under the 2009 federal economic stimulus package.

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT also published an interim final rule describing required certification standards for EHR technology.

Tony Trenkle, CMS director of e-health and standards, recently stressed how the interplay between different regulations will be important in determining what health care providers will need to demonstrate to qualify for the incentive payments.

ONC policy analyst Steve Posnack said that CMS and ONC are coordinating their regulations to ensure that the standards set for determining meaningful use are in step with rules governing certification of EHRs (Mosquera, Government Health IT, 3/18).

Above article publish on http://www.ihealthbeat.org/articles/2010/3/19/cms-aims-to-coordinate-meaningful-use-rules-with-other-regulations.aspx

HDM Breaking News

The Centers for Medicaid and Medicaid Services has sent a letter to all state Medicaid directors to provide initial guidance on upcoming Medicaid EHR incentive payments. Under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, hospitals and physicians that treat a qualifying number of Medicaid patients can apply for incentive payments based on their meaningful use of electronic health records.

The letter points out that states may immediately apply for federal funds to pay for 90% of administrative planning activities. It spells out criteria to receive the funding.

“This letter, including the enclosures, will provide preliminary guidance on state expenses related to activities in support of the administration of incentive payments to providers,” CMS states. “More information will be forthcoming through guidance and rulemaking regarding state administrative expenses and provider incentive payments. We intend to published proposed regulations to address the steps outlined in this letter by the end of the year.”

Other points of interest in the letter include:

• States should coordinate activities with their CMS regional office to reduce confusion of the Medicare and Medicaid incentive programs and maximize the ability to advance health I.T.;
• States should view Medicaid planning activities as part of larger evolving state health I.T. efforts; and
• States must settle a range of issues before they can begin making incentive payments. For instance, providers using certified EHRs are not eligible for Medicaid incentive payments unless the EHR is compatible with state or federal administrative management systems. “Therefore, states risk making unallowable incentive payments prior to receiving guidance on how to make these systems compatible.”

The letter and accompanying documents are available at cms.hhs.gov/Recovery/11_HealthIT.asp.

Above article published on

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/stimulus-38922-1.html

By the Associated Press

President Barack Obama, faced with falling approval ratings and increasingly impatient with Senate negotiations over health care, is weighing a shift in strategy that would offer more details of his goals for overhauling the nation’s healthcare system.

The president is considering a speech in the next week or so in which he would be “more prescriptive” about what he feels Congress must include in a bill, top adviser David Axelrod said Tuesday in an interview. The speech might occur before the Sept. 15 deadline the White House gave to Senate negotiators to seek a bipartisan bill, Axelrod said. He suggested that two key Republicans have not bargained in good faith.

Congress reconvenes next Tuesday after an August recess in which critics of Obama’s health proposals dominated many public forums.

Some Obama allies, watching his approval ratings tumble in polls along with support for a healthcare overhaul, have urged the president to take a more hands-on approach. They feel he gave too much leeway to Congress, where one bill has passed three House committees, another has passed a Senate committee and a third has been bogged down in protracted negotiations in the Senate Finance Committee.

Axelrod indicated that Obama would not offer new proposals but would be more specific about his top priorities.

“The ideas are all there on the table,” Axelrod said. “Now we are in a new phase, and it’s time to pull the strands of these together.”

He said there is serious discussion in the White House of Obama “giving a speech that lays out in specific ways what he thinks” about the essential elements of a healthcare bill.

Axelrod said it was possible that the speech could occur before a planned Sept. 15 Obama address on healthcare in Pittsburgh.

Obama has called for innovations such as a public health insurance plan to compete with private insurers, but he has not insisted on it. It was not clear Tuesday the degree to which he might press for various proposals in a new speech.

Obama also plans to meet with Democratic congressional leaders on Tuesday.

Above article published on

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20090902/REG/309029973/-

Two weeks ago, the Obama administration offered nearly $1.2 billion in stimulus-funded grants to set up state-run health information exchanges, and create 70 “health IT regional extension centers” to help physicians adapt to the digital era, a term officials defined in greater detail during a conference call late last week, Modern Healthcare reports. “As many as 1,250 participants logged- or dialed-in to hear and ask questions about the ground rules to apply” for the grant money “to be awarded over a four-year period to about 70 not-for-profit organizations that will run the regional extension centers.”

The centers will spend more than $500,000 a year, mostly on services for physicians; serve approximately 1,000 doctors each, mainly at smaller primary care offices; help doctors select an effective electronic record system; help them implement it and achieve “meaningful use,” the administration’s requirement for doctors hoping to get other stimulus payments; provide “in-depth” technical support on “a narrow list of vendor systems.” A caller pointed out that the government’s role in recommending and supporting individual, private vendors raised a potential conflict of interest for state officials choosing the potential grantees that will set up the centers.

Half of the grant money will go directly to states to help establish “a widespread and sustainable health information exchange,” American Medical News reports. “Legal, financial and technical support is necessary to enable secure exchange of sensitive patient data across health care systems, according to HHS. The program will help fund efforts at the state level to implement directories and technical services to enable interoperability within and across states. Some health IT experts say such assistance is vital in helping physician practices become meaningful users”.

Above article published on

http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/Daily-Reports/2009/August/31/Health-IT-Monday.aspx

$1.2 Billion Slated for HITECH Priority Grant Programs

By News Staff

Nearly $1.2 billion soon will be available to help the nation’s hospitals, physicians and other health care professionals purchase and use electronic health records, or EHRs, according to an Aug. 20 announcement from Vice President Joe Biden. Money from the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health, or HITECH, Act priority grant programs, which are funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, will start flowing in 2010.

“With electronic health records, we are making health care safer, we’re making it more efficient, we’re making you healthier, and we’re saving money along the way,” said Biden in the announcement. “These are four necessities we need for health care in the 21st century.”

The money will be divided between two programs.

• $598 million has been set aside to establish the Health Information Technology Extension Program, which will allow about 70 health IT regional extension centers to offer technical assistance and guidance to support health care professionals using EHRs.
• $564 million will fund the State Health Information Exchange Cooperative Agreement Program, an initiative designed to help states and other entities establish health information exchange capacity among hospitals and health care professionals.

According to David Blumenthal, M.D., M.P.P., the national coordinator for health IT, the rollout of the programs “represents a critical step forward in laying the groundwork for meaningful use of EHRs.”

“Together, the grants will offer much-needed local and regional assistance and technical support to providers while enabling coordination and alignment within and among states, ultimately allowing information to follow patients anywhere within the health care system,” Blumenthal said in an Aug. 20 update e-mailed to health IT stakeholders and posted on the HHS Web site.

Information about the HITECH priority grants program and application requirements is available online from HHS

Above article published on

http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/publications/news/news-now/practice-management/20090826hitech-grants.html

By Anne Zieger

If the state’s governor gets his way, Kentucky will soon be home to a statewide electronic health records system. To foster that goal, State Gov. Steve Beshear (D) has created the Governor’s Office of Electronic Health Information.

The state is creating the office to make sure it gets its share of the Obama administration’s stimulus funding package for EHRs, which goes to states who adopt them by 2014.

To get those funds, states are required to create a department that oversees its EMR project. These state offices serve as single points-of-contact for federal and state agencies helping to get the EMR ball rolling. In this case, the office will also work with the state’s three regional health information organizations, healthcare providers, consumers, insurers and the whole kit and kaboodle involved in sharing health data.

It will be interesting to see if any of this comes to fruition. Despite some big talk, RHIOs aren’t going great guns, and getting a state’s worth of EMRs in place by 2014 sounds a tad optimistic at best. But hey, press releases wouldn’t exist if people weren’t optimistic!

Above article published on

http://www.fierceemr.com/story/kentucky-launches-initiative-designed-foster-statewide-emr-system/2009-08-20

By Joseph Conn

Another month, another matrix in the development of definitions of “meaningful use,” the key criteria providers must meet to unlock tens of billions of dollars of federal healthcare information technology subsidies under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

The Health Information Technology Policy Committee, a creature of the stimulus law, received a third set of recommendations from its meaningful-use work group. The recommendations were again detailed, as were their predecessors handed over by the group in June and July, in a spreadsheet or “matrix” format.

The HIT Policy Committee accepted the recommendations, which under the order of events set out in the stimulus law the committee will forward to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology at HHS, which will hand them over to the CMS for official rulemaking. All of these hand-offs will occur fairly seamlessly since David Blumenthal, the physician head of the ONC, is chairman of the HIT Policy Committee and Tony Trenkle, director of the Office of eHealth Standards and Services at the CMS, is a policy committee member. Both men attended Friday’s meeting.

This latest batch also stuck to the original staging schedule first proposed by the work group in June of creating three sets of increasingly more complex meaningful-use criteria, which hospitals and office-based physicians must meet to qualify for the subsidy payments. The matrix includes a dozen broad goals, more specific objectives and proposed metrics by which compliance with the goals and objectives can be measured. The lowest bar is set for 2011, the first year electronic health-record subsidy payments can be made under the Medicare portion of the technology funding program.

For example, one care goal is to provide a patient healthcare team access to “comprehensive patient health data.” In 2011, one objective proposed for meeting that goal is a requirement that all hospitals use computerized physician order entry, or CPOE, systems for at least 10% of orders by doctors, nurses and physician assistants. By 2013, the work group proposed raising the bar, requiring that 100% of hospital orders be initiated using CPOE. In 2015, the objective switches from using a specific system, CPOE, to achieving “minimal levels of performance” that can be measured using clinical outcomes standards to be agreed upon sometime between now and then.

The other highlight of the meeting was the report and recommendations by the policy committee work group on EHR system certification and adoption. Under the stimulus law, only certified EHR systems qualify for federal subsidies, and only if they are used in a “meaningful manner.” In the past, the federal government deemed the certification of an EHR by the not-for-profit Certification Commission for Health Information Technology as good enough to meet its certification requirements for Stark and anti-kickback exceptions for EHR subsidies made by hospitals to office-based physicians. CCHIT took its cues on certification criteria from the American Health Information Community, the Bush administration’s counterpart to the HIT Policy Committee, and developed a program that tested vendors’ products on their ability to perform more than 300 functions.

But the stimulus act, which became law in February, did not specify that CCHIT would be even an acceptable certification body for EHRs for stimulus law subsidies, much less the only certification body with deeming authority as in the past.

To guide the new way forward, the certification and adoption work group made five recommendations, which were accepted by the policy committee.

First, the group recommended that certification under the stimulus law should focus solely on the functions needed to meet the meaningful-use standards. The statute provides eight specific areas that the HIT Policy Committee must consider in making its recommendations on meaningful use, plus 10 other areas that the policy committee might also consider.

Still, at least initially, the number of criteria against which systems will be tested under the stimulus law is likely to be far fewer than the 300 or so in the most recent CCHIT testing regime. In June, CCHIT announced its intention to continue to offer its comprehensive testing program, but also would add new testing and certification schemes tailored to the meaningful-use criteria as they are developed.

Second, according to the recommendations, progress needs to be made on testing and certifying systems that have the functionality to meet privacy, security and interoperability requirements called for in the stimulus act. Those include some amendments to the federal privacy law under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, such as the requirement that the systems be able to produce and report audit trails of where and when disclosures of patient information has been made, and to manage patient consents to release information, including a new authority that patients can block the release of their treatment information to their insurance company if they pay for treatment out-of-pocket.

Third, the work group recommended generally that the certification process be made more objective and transparent, with a specific recommendation that the federal National Institute of Standards and Technology, an agency of the Commerce Department, be tasked with helping the ONC develop a process to establish a separate and independent accreditation procedure for certification organizations such as CCHIT and any additional organizations that might join CCHIT in certifying EHRs to stimulus law criteria.

Fourth, the work group suggested that the certification process needs to be standardized so there is a level playing field for all seekers of EHR certification, whether they are commercial vendors of proprietary software systems, provider organizations that have developed home-grown systems, or communities or service providers of open-source EHR systems.

Finally, the work group recommended that the ONC and the CMS leverage as much as possible the work that has been done to date developing a certification program. Since an initial, official definition of meaningful use isn’t expected from the CMS until early next year, the work group recommended establishing a “preliminary certification process” so vendors can begin preparing their systems to what will be a likely set of criteria. CCHIT, for example, has prepared an analysis of its current testing and certification criteria and how they stack up against what might be expected to meet meaningful use under a new certification regime.

Above article published on

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20090817/DOSE/308179929